[Tagging] different access restrictions for different entrances to an area
Nathan Edgars II
neroute2 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 00:25:50 BST 2011
On 10/25/2011 6:03 PM, Anthony wrote:
> What are we pretending, for the sake of argument, that
As I say below:
"Private Property / Walt Disney World Resort Guest, Cast, and Business
> and access=private mean?
"Service & Authorized Vehicles Only"
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II<neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is the area behind the Magic Kingdom in Walt Disney World.
>> Signs going northbound at A and B say "Service & Authorized Vehicles Only".
>> Southbound at C, a sign says "Private Property / Walt Disney World Resort
>> Guest, Cast, and Business Invitees Only".
>> (I verified A and C a few days ago; it's possible that B has changed
>> The exact tags to use for these are a matter of recent debate, and it's not
>> worth rehashing that. But it's clear that they are different (a guest can
>> enter Disney from Reams but can't exit that way), so for the sake of
>> argument let's call the former access=private and the latter
>> access=destination. Note that the area from A and B south to the beginning
>> of the motorway is also access=destination due to the presence of the main
>> entrance gate (and a sign identical to that at C on Vista west of Golden
>> The question is how the segments of road between these points should be
>> tagged. Should the ability to U-turn be taken into account (thus everything
>> but the close vicinity of A and B is destination in both directions)? Or
>> should it be assumed that one won't U-turn for the hell of it (thus all
>> three roads are private northbound and destination southbound)? Or should
>> no_straight_on restrictions be used at the signs, with no access tags on the
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging