<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18852"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>The tagging reference procedure is definitely grown beyond
easy usage. An interactive tagging reference resource
like the John Smith's demo site from a short time ago is on the top of my "most
wanted list".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title="mailto:stevagewp@gmail.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:stevagewp@gmail.com">Steve Bennett</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 07, 2009 12:55 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tag discussion, strategy and related
tools</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Tagging] Government buildings</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT><BR></DIV><BR>Also, didn't I read somewhere that it
was okay to use terms that only have local relevance? Are there any
policy/guideline documents behind tagging that I should read? As I've commented
before, it makes no sense to me at all that the choice of what tags to use has
so many different sources: wiki, tagwatch/osmdoc/...,
potlatch/josm/merkaartor/..., mapnik/osmrender/...<BR><BR>Surely it's time to
get a little more organised about this.<BR></BODY></HTML>