<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16535"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV>>What inevitable ?. I think that drawing sidewalks is silly and waste of
time. </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial> Around here, sidewalks can be such a
novelty that I recently read a request of someone looking for a map of my city
with sidewalks - </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>"Does anyone know if a map exists showing which
streets have sidewalks ..."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><A
title="http://www.city-data.com/forum/greenville-spartanburg-area/958850-where-walkable-neighborhoods.html#post13921226
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="http://www.city-data.com/forum/greenville-spartanburg-area/958850-where-walkable-neighborhoods.html#post13921226">http://www.city-data.com/forum/greenville-spartanburg-area/958850-where-walkable-neighborhoods.html#post13921226</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Let say that 99.99% of the unclassified and residential roads can be walked
on both sides, why should we draw the sidewalks everywhere ? It would be more
clever to tag where sidewalks are missing or not allowed, imo.</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial> Perhaps the ability to specify
defaults for a admin area would help to eliminate redundant
entries.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>