<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:46 +0100<BR>> From: dieterdreist@gmail.com<BR>> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org<BR>> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Combo Weight Bridges<BR>> <BR>> 2011/1/12 Martin Simon <grenzdebil@gmail.com>:<BR>> > These signs are refering to "military load class" ("militärische<BR>> > Lastenklasse"), not to maxweight.<BR>> > Other than the real weight of the vehicle, these classes contain<BR>> > factors like the number of axles, overall dimensions of the vehicle<BR>> > etc.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> yes, but for this discussion this doesn't change anything ;-)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > AFAIK, this does not affect civilian traffic in any way.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> because regular traffic is restricted to 40 tons or has to get special<BR>> permissions for every single transport where all bridges, roads, etc.<BR>> in the way are checked one by one.<BR>> <BR>> cheers,<BR>> Martin<BR>> <BR><BR>
Well, my sign is definitely only for civilian traffic here. ;) And on this bridge, it has the same sign on both directions.<BR>
Here's a link to the picture of the sign that I took: <A href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/rickmastfan67/Interstates/P1010122s.jpg">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/rickmastfan67/Interstates/P1010122s.jpg</A> (please do not post on any other websites without asking me first).<BR>
<BR>
Anyways, I still think the "maxweight:combo" might work best for this. I could at least tag the "normal" limit now and wait for some more consensus on how to tag the second weight later if I wanted to.<BR>
<BR>
-- James<BR> </body>
</html>