<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Peter,
<blockquote cite="mid:4D7A4F98.1040602@uni-paderborn.de" type="cite">...
<blockquote type="cite">...<br>
</blockquote>
... protect_class<br>
</blockquote>
protect_class doesn´t exist anywhere. It should be an OSM-own tag.<br>
<br>
<br>
<font face="Arial"><font size="2">but I made a decision for
"protect_type" because it implies less any quality rating
than "_class" and its shorter.</font></font><br>
it should have its "valence" in combination with protected_area. <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4D7A4F98.1040602@uni-paderborn.de" type="cite">While
I
agree that protect_id is far from perfect, I would suggest you to <br>
ADD the new tags <br>
ADD a note explaining why protect_id is not good and why that should be
overtaken by usage of protect_class <br>
but STAY with the existant protect_ids for now. <br>
</blockquote>
than I will update the wiki-page ...<br>
<p><font face="Arial"><font size="2">like:<br>
----------------------------------------------</font></font><br>
- instead protect_id the key protect_type<br>
</p>
and start the follwoing external ID-keys with a "ref:"<br>
<br>
ref:NLWKN=NSG LÜ 259<br>
ref:EUR27=3170<br>
ref:BAYER=UZT 56 HH<br>
_Question_ ist, if names-syntax above is usefull, because its barely
significant, better:<br>
ref:iucn_levle=4<br>
ref:protection_code_NLWKN=NSG LÜ 259<br>
ref:habitat_code_EUR27=3170<br>
ref:hecl_code_BAYER=UZT 56 HH<br>
<font face="Arial"><font size="2">----------------------------------------------</font></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4D7A4F98.1040602@uni-paderborn.de" type="cite">That
at
least helps every application using these tags to change in the
future. <br>
Additionally you don't destroy the work of other people without their
permission (a little bit more polite). <br>
</blockquote>
oh ... I thought, most of mapper would not realise this
"backend-action" and would be a kind of happy ... but yes, your right.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4D7A4F98.1040602@uni-paderborn.de" type="cite">...<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
thanks, <br>
regards, crom<br>
...
</body>
</html>