<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Am 15.04.2012 16:23, schrieb Eckhart Wörner:
<blockquote cite="mid:1382563.UEHgbvYOV3@obiwan" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 15:42:29 schrieb fly:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I still do not get one major point which was totally left out on the first
scheme. What actually belongs to a "point" and how are they tagged.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Especially
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">on big crossings and roundabouts I always was confused (e.g. it might be
possible that a part of this point is blocked but how do I know which one
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">and
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">you might be able to use the first/last exit/entrance of a junction but not
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">the
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">rest. )
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Indeed, this is what I was worried about as well.
Here's a proposed (partial) fix, which starts from the original proposal.
Let's assume that 123, 456 and 789 are connected LCD which describe a road.
Further assume that at 456 there's a big intersection.
Then:
- All ways between 123 and 456 are marked tmc=DE:123+456, and all ways between
456 and 789 are marked tmc=DE:456+789.
- All ways on the intersection 456 leading from 123 to 789 are then marked
tmc=DE:456+.
This has several advantages:
- A traffic jam between 123 and 456 will not block the intersection 456 anymore.
- Exits are defined as follows: an exit at 456 in positive direction starts at
a way that is tagged either tmc=DE:456+ or tmc=DE:123+456 ("from"), uses a
node that is part of a way tagged either tmc=DE:456+ or tmc=DE:456+789 ("via")
and ends at a way that is tagged neither tmc=DE:456+ nor tmc=DE:456+789, nor
tmc=DE:123+456 ("to"). An exit is therefore a maneuver. This may sound a bit
technical at first, but none of this is exposed to the tagging, and the idea of
an exit is probably quite intuitive.
- Likewise, entries are defined.
- Automatic consistency checking is still possible, as there are no holes.
There is at least one issue that still has to be addressed: this tagging does
not imply an ordering of the exits / entries; it is not clear what the first,
second… exit would be.
Eckhart Wörner
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hello,<br>
thank you far all your contributions so far, and here's just a
preliminary response. It was my idea to mail an answer to all open
technical questions as soon as I can come with a reasonable result
in all depth, and some topics are still discussed with our TMC team.
So I apologize for not resonding earlier, but please allow another
day.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">Mit freundlichen Grüßen,<br>
Heinrich Knauf<br>
<br>
infoware GmbH<br>
Riemenschneiderstr. 11<br>
53175 Bonn<br>
GERMANY<br>
<p><span><a href="http://facebook.infoware.de/"
title="http://facebook.infoware.de/">
<span title="http://facebook.infoware.de/">facebook_follow_us</span></a></span></p>
office: +49 228 338899-21<br>
email: <a href="mailto:knauf@infoware.de">knauf@infoware.de</a><br>
web: <a href="http://www.infoware.de">www.infoware.de</a><br>
infoware Gesellschaft für Informationstechnik mbH<br>
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schulte-Hillen, Martin Langhoff;<br>
Sitz Bonn; Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 14141<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>