<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <link href="chrome://translator/skin/floatingPanel.css"
      type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2012-10-16 21:33, Dave F. wrote :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:507DB688.4010006@madasafish.com" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      OSM Inspector is listing type=boundary as an error <b><a
          moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
          href="http://tinyurl.com/c539jhk">http://tinyurl.com/c539jhk</a></b><br>
      <br>
      but the wiki implies it's legitimate. <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relation">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relation</a><br>
      <br>
      Which is correct? <br>
    </blockquote>
    Is the whole world (suddenly?) covered with that same error.<br>
    Can 600 000 persons be wrong?<br>
    <br>
    <a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Multipolygons#type.3Dboundary">Geofabrik's
      explanation is this : </a><br>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <h3><span class="editsection">type=boundary   [<a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=OSM_Inspector/Views/Multipolygons&action=edit&section=10"
            title="Edit section: Context">edit</a>]</span> <span
          class="mw-headline" id="Context"></span></h3>
    </blockquote>
    It looks like Geofabrik belong to "<a
      href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon">some
      suggesting</a>", but convincingly:<br>
    <blockquote type="cite">Some suggest to also use type=multipolygon
      (and not <a
        href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary"
        title="Relation:boundary">type=boundary</a>) for boundary
      relations if you want applications to use area-building rules
      (i.e., connecting outers to form rings, excluding enclaves, etc.)
      A boundary relation is easily spotted by its boundary=* tag; no
      need to use type=boundary. Although currently the most used way to
      add boundaries is with a type=boundary tag but with the rules of
      multipolygons.
    </blockquote>
    Would someone have forgotten to try his patch?  ;-)<br>
    <br>
    <div style="bottom: auto; left: 22px; right: auto; top: 326px;
      display: none;" class="translator-theme-default"
      id="translator-floating-panel">
      <div title="Click to translate"
        id="translator-floating-panel-button"></div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>