<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:49:57 +0900<br>> From: erringtona@gmail.com<br>> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link<br>> <br>> > Richard didn't say he uses that key *because* it's not rendered; he<br>> > uses it because it makes sense. The fact that it's not rendered on<br>> > general-purpose maps justifies the view that the tag won't cause problems.<br>> <br>> It's not rendered because nobody knows about it. There are only 36<br>> instances of ref:unsigned in the whole world, so it probably was not a<br>> good example to use. Anyway, shouldn't it be reg_ref (Regional<br>> reference) instead? Or a relation?<br>> <br><BR>In fact, the tag "unsigned_ref" is used more often. But most of those tags are from NE2. However, it's used a total of 27945 times as of this post.<BR><a href="http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/unsigned_ref">http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/unsigned_ref</a><BR> <BR>--James<BR> </div></body>
</html>