<html><head></head><body>If you look at my entire message, I did point out that vertical clearance was an attribute of the ways, not the bridge. How should the vertical clearance from the bridge to the water be tagged, and how do you tag what height of water was the reference point? If the water level is high, there will be less room for watercraft to pass under the bridge.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><br /><br /><br /><br />On 06/giu/2013, at 23:55, "John F. Eldredge" <john@jfeldredge.com> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">the maximum clearance for vehicles passing under the bridge. The proposal mentions the first two, but not the third.</blockquote><br /><br />in osm this is an attribute on the way(s) under the bridge, not of the bridge itself<br /><br />cheers,<br />Martin<br /><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>