<html><head></head><body>This approach sounds useful.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">fly <lowflight66@googlemail.com> writes:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">But how to we proceed ?<br /><br />If we agree that landuse=reservoir should be used for the whole area. Do<br />we need a temporary tag or adding water=reservoir to all of them?<br /><br />Only simple case are where a water=reservoir is already tagged (either<br />on the same object or within one.</blockquote><br />Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose:<br /><br />Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to<br />be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir<br />and protection zones. (I have an attitude that landuse will often<br />align with parcel boundaries.)<br /><br />Let landuse=reservoir be deprecated, because it's confusing.<br /><br />Let water=reservoir be used, because it is not confusing. That tag<br
/>denots the fact that the area is a) water and b) a reservoir, which is<br />object tagging, not landuse tagging.<br /><br /><br />Does this make anyone significantly unhappy?<br /><br /><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>