<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/6/8 Greg Troxel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gdt@ir.bbn.com" target="_blank">gdt@ir.bbn.com</a>></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose:<br>
<br>
Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to<br>
be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir<br>
and protection zones. (I have an attitude that landuse will often<br>
align with parcel boundaries.)<br>
<br>
Let landuse=reservoir be deprecated, because it's confusing.<br>
<br>
Let water=reservoir be used, because it is not confusing. That tag<br>
denots the fact that the area is a) water and b) a reservoir, which is<br>
object tagging, not landuse tagging.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style>I'd rather prefer to have the water protection as a different tag then landuse, something like protected_area, because my guess is that reservoir protection is not necessarily the only or main landuse of any such area with obligations to protect the ground from water contamination. </div>
<div style><br></div><div style>cheers,</div><div style>Martin</div></div>
</div></div>