<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-06-24 14:50, Serge Wroclawski
wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADbCdJhpt_tiNqjTcfhjojA=jNvkxo3tfXBwz0Rt01G+TEktqA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Usually the "url" tag is used for an organization's
website. For
example, many musems, libraries, restaurants, etc. have an
official
website. That's what the website (or url) tag is for (I think
"website" is actually preferred but url is just as good).
I'd generally not use a Google+ page for a site, just like I
wouldn't
use a Facebook page, or a MySpace page, or a Twitter account,
unless
that was the only site that exists, and is curated by the
organization
itself.</blockquote>
I have suggested without much success that the value for <b>any</b>
key defining an "organization" (or anything that can be defined with
a web page) could, and should best, contain an URL.<br>
"contain" means that software displaying the value should
auto-recognize an URL and make it clickable.<br>
There's no point in having the reader make a Google search for some
text when an URL gives him the correct search result right away.<br>
For example: for "operator" as you can see it in <a
href="http://www.waymarkedtrails.org/?zoom=14&lat=50.51045&lon=5.64918">www.waymarkedtrails.org/?zoom=14&lat=50.51045&lon=5.64918</a>
(open Routes window) I used <a
href="http://www.sprimont.be/index.php?&id=23">http://www.sprimont.be/index.php?&id=23.</a><br>
Lonvia did not recognize it as an ULR by lack of guidance.<br>
<a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2406099">Тhe
OSM relation page did.</a> But map readers are not supposed to
open elation pages, are they?<br>
<br>
Cheers,
<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
</body>
</html>