<html><head></head><body>I would prefer that you didn't pretend we will deprecate a tag so widely used just so a small proportion of them can have another power tag on it when we can easily just add transformer=yes or something similar. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><br /><br />Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore 16:31, François Lacombe <francois.lacombe@telecom-bretagne.eu> ha scritto:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Another possibility would be to deprecate power=pole and power=tower and use man_made=pole and man_made=tower+tower:type=power<br />It would allow us to have nodes with man_made=pole + power=transformer or any other hosted feature.</blockquote><br /><br />I'd prefer to use something more specific if we'd decide to move power=tower to the man_made key, e.g. man_made=electrical_tower<br /><br />cheers,<br />Martin<br /><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
---<br>
cheers, Chris<br>
osm user, chillly</body></html>