<div dir="ltr"><div>This proposal sounds unclear to me : It says the tag to use is currently under discussion, so what are we voting for ?<br><br></div>Not to mention the abbreviation problem...<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br clear="all"><div><b>François Lacombe</b><br><br>francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu<br><a href="http://www.infos-reseaux.com" target="_blank">http://www.infos-reseaux.com</a><br></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/9/30 Matthijs Melissen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:info@matthijsmelissen.nl" target="_blank">info@matthijsmelissen.nl</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 September 2013 18:22, fly <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lowflight66@googlemail.com" target="_blank">lowflight66@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Major problem I find is that using a abbreviation is not the way we tag<br>
in OSM and it is often misleading.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We do use abbreviations for keys/values: for example mtb, bmx, hgv, psv, url, rcn.<br><br></div><div>In this particular case, I think more people have familiarity with the abbreviation than with the full term, so I see here nothing wrong with sticking to the abbreviation. Or are you proposing to start using uniform_resource_locator as well?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br></font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>-- Matthijs<br></div></font></span></div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>