<html><head></head><body><div class="gmail_quote">Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">2013/10/2 John F. Eldredge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john@jfeldredge.com" target="_blank">john@jfeldredge.com</a>></span><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I think it makes sense to tag a no-longer-maintained hiking trail in a manner that will still be rendered, but will be rendered in a manner that distinguishes it from an actively-maintained trail.</blockquote></div><br /><br />
what is rendered or not in a given map is the decision of the style sheet maintainer, from the data point we should make it clear what kind of object it is, so that the data consumer can decide whether he wants this kind of object in his style or not.<br />
<br />cheers,<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br /></div></div>
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br clear="all">My point was that the tagging needs to indicate maintained vs. non-maintained, and preferably also any known problems that would make an unmaintained trail impassable, tagged at the location of the problem, such as a section blocked by a landslide or a heavy growth of briars.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
John F. Eldredge -- john@jfeldredge.com<br>
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness: <br>
only light can do that.<br>
Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that."<br>
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.<br>
</body></html>