<html><head></head><body>This ele / height discussion might show we need a simple tagging scheme to distinguish wind turbines that can be seen as a landmark.<br>
Yves<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br>
"Janko Mihelić" <janjko@gmail.com> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Dana ponedjeljak, 7. listopada 2013., korisnik John F. Eldredge<<a href="mailto:john@jfeldredge.com">john@jfeldredge.com</a>> je napisao:<br />><br />> As far as I know, we don't have a standard method for tagging the height of an object mounted on top of another object, as distinct from the combined heights of the objects above ground, or the elevation above sea level of the base of the object. There are likely to be other cases, in addition to wind turbines, where this distinction would be useful.<br />
><br /><br />I think we have a method.<br /><br />Say we have a 20 meter building with a 3 meter wind turbine on the roof. You would have an area tagged with building=yes + height=20 and a node tagged with power=generator + generator:source=wind + height=23 + min_height=20.<br />
<br />It's a question if a power=generator represents the whole tower or just the generator. I would maybe add a man_made=tower to all wind turbines to remove any doubt.
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.</body></html>