<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/7/13 12:18 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTB+df4-8Djj6W_neAnLjMdza_j915UT5yBRFsozbnztJg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2013/10/7 fly <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:lowflight66@googlemail.com" target="_blank">lowflight66@googlemail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div id=":6cq">You are allowed to push your bike on every
footway/pedestrian plus ways<br>
with vehicle=no. E.g. it is useless. Either you are
allowed to ride<br>
(bicycle=yes/designated) or not (bicycle=no or
vehicle=no)</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">I agree that bicycle=dismount seems
useless, at least as long as you only look at public ways in
Germany (and probably in most countries), but there are a lot
of places where you can walk but you cannot bring your
bicycle, not even pushing. E.g. in shopping malls and on
private squares there might be restrictions. Then again there
might be further distinctions (e.g. "are you allowed to carry
your bike"? What if it is foldable? ...)<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
it has implications for routing of bicycles. bicycle=no will mean
that<br>
it will never be used on a bicycle route. bicycle=dismount would
indicate<br>
that inclusion of the way on a bicycle route is reasonable.<br>
<br>
richard<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>