<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 08.10.2013 20:16, schrieb Volker
Schmidt:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CALQ-OR7XJnU+zUSgD289UQST6rkSn5L1B-XOvyxcgTUm=Pbyeg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">
<br>
</div>
Just for your reference - while for many cases, I agree
that bicycle=no<br>
is appropriate, there are quite interesting cycleways in
the Czech<br>
Republic, where using bicycle=dismount for nodes on a path
would<br>
make things easier for people editing OSM. Consider this:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://img.ct24.cz/cache/900x700/article/20/1936/193540.jpg"
target="_blank">http://img.ct24.cz/cache/900x700/article/20/1936/193540.jpg</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://img.ct24.cz/multimedia/videos/image/646/medium/193542.jpg"
target="_blank">http://img.ct24.cz/multimedia/videos/image/646/medium/193542.jpg</a><br>
(and don't ask me what idiot proposed a cycleway like
this).<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is the standard way of doing things here in Italy
as well. At every "end of cycleway" sign you are legally
supposed to dismount and cross the lateral road as
pedestrian<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
well, as it is also signed as the end of the legal footway/sidewalk
- in my opinion it is no need for a _dismount_ there.<br>
In my opinion it is just a legal backdoor, that on these driveways
(or serviceways?) you leave the legal cycleway/footway (with the
regarding legal rights above the otherwise crossing traffic) and
have to obey the crossing traffic for your own risk - even as
walker, but also as cyclist.<br>
<br>
Georg<br>
</body>
</html>