<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/30/2013 06:40 PM, Egil Hjelmeland
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:529A230B.2070807@egil-hjelmeland.no"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
So my revised suggestion to tag a webcam public on internet is<br>
<br>
man_made=surveillance<br>
surveillance= indoor|outdoor|public *<br>
surveillance:type=camera *<br>
surveillance:zone=weather|traffic|scenic *<br>
<br>
contact:webcam=<url><br>
<br>
name=*<br>
operator=*<br>
description=*<br>
camera:direction= compass degrees *<br>
camera:angle = horizontal angle of view *<br>
<br>
* means optional <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This sound completely crazy to me.<br>
Why not:<br>
man_made:surveillance:url:contact=<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://">http://</a>... ;
image_only_it's_a_camera_please_do_not_phone_the_device <br>
<br>
A newbie looking for a way to map a webcam will just not map it.<br>
<br>
A scheme with camera=webcam/surveillance/... url=* should be
sufficient, like Nounours proposed.<br>
<br>
Having a new proposal with a camera=... key is a big task, but
"man_made=surveillance" seems insanely pompous to me.<br>
<br>
Yves<br>
</body>
</html>