<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/19/2014 07:23 PM, Colin Smale
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:c190af380cd76c15ad180d877e8faae1@xs4all.nl"
type="cite">On 2014-01-19 18:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;
border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">2014/1/19 Colin Smale <span><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:colin.smale@xs4all.nl">colin.smale@xs4all.nl</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 .8ex;
border-left: 1px #ccc solid; padding-left: 1ex;">
<p>The standard sign for "no vehicles" (red ring on
white background) does not apply to bicycles being
pushed by hand, but<span style="font-size: 12px;"> as
a bicycle is technically a vehicle whether it is
being ridden or not, there are some esoteric edge
cases in the "no vehicles" category, like "no
vehicles carrying explosives". If your bike carrier
is full of Semtex, dismounting is IMHO not enough to
allow you to pass the sign.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<div>I'd tag this a "no explosives" rather than "no bike
with explosives"</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
By the way, w.r.t. the explosives business, "no explosives" would
not be right either, as the sign only applies to vehicles (which
includes cycles) and does not prohibit you from carrying them on
foot. You just dump the bike and put the Semtex in your rucksack.
Then you are no longer a vehicle.
</blockquote>
<br>
Openstreetmap routing for cyclist suicide bombers - interesting
niche but user retention is going to suck !<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>