<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-02-25 15:24, Peter Wendorff
wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:530CA7AD.6070605@uni-paderborn.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi André,
as far as I know, the same would be possible with
opening_hours="24/7, Fr 14:00-22:00 off"</pre>
</blockquote>
Oh no, please please please, let us not start that same thread all
over again.<br>
(opening-hours: how to code "always but..."?)<br>
What you say has already been said, amended, denied, rejected in
every way etc.<br>
It's a tagging that I originally proposed and the comments were
("inside quotes")<br>
-1 24/7 : "it's wrong", "is used for a rendering icon"<br>
-1 ,; : ,<br>
-1 off : "is not used", "is used, but not like that"<br>
On 2014-02-25 15:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<blockquote type="cite">+1<br>
</blockquote>
-1<br>
</div>
On 2014-02-25 15:49, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote :<br>
<blockquote type="cite">opening_hours="open; Fr 14:00-22:00 off"
<br>
</blockquote>
-1 : open : "it's an invention"<br>
<br>
So ... your contradictory replies are the exact proof that
closing-hours is badly needed.<br>
Failing that, the chaos that you demonstrate will continue.<br>
And that means a useless database.<br>
<br>
Only closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00 cannot be disputed.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:530CA7AD.6070605@uni-paderborn.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">no need for an extra tag.
Also keep in mind that two tags opening_hours and closing_hours are
error prone when used both together at the same object.
regards
Peter
Am 25.02.2014 14:50, schrieb André Pirard:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I had to tag several parking lots closed on times such as *Fr 14:00-22:00* when
the market took place there.
I raised a convoluted discussion: everyone had a different opinion about that
tagging, plus strange comments (*).
After more than 10 hours spent in research and collaboration, I had to conclude
with the inability of the Key:Opening_hours
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Opening_hours"><http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Opening_hours></a> specification to express that timing,
or explain it, at least simply.
I finally used a vary straightforward and clear:
*closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00*
and I suggest that you use it too and that you add that key to the specification.
It can be clearly explained, once won't hurt, as follows:
As often funnily put, /*closing-hours*/ is the same as /*opening-hours*/ except
that it is exactly the opposite :-)
Seriously: use /*closing-hours*/ with the same rules as *opening-hours* and
invert the result: opening time becomes closing time and conversely.
It couldn't be more simple, obvious and understandable. Quite the opposite of
that story.
May this be helpful,
Cheers,
André.
(*) I read very strange statements such as:
"off" must not be defined, it must be grasped.
"off" is not used.
"off" is used, but not like that.
xxx, must not be defined because it has been used for a long time.
it's wrong.
it's wrong.
... (without saying what's right)
etc, etc, etc...
In face of such chaos, I tried to help by putting the rules in a clear diagram
so that the incongruities would stand out and be corrected, and the reactions
were twofold:
- yeah, finally a simple and understandable explanation
- it's wrong, but again without saying more, less making corrections
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>