<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-02-26 13:24, Robin `ypid`
Schneider wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:530DDD0A.6070906@aol.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 26.02.2014 12:45, André Pirard wrote:</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-1 : open : "it's an invention"
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">It was introduced by Netzwolf some years ago because it is needed as
<rule_modifier> (when used together with a comment). It is now used over 150
times to do exactly that (regex: /open\s+"/). Of course it is an invention but
one which is required.</pre>
</blockquote>
It was said to me in the sense "you invented it" (and as tersely as
that).<br>
And this discussion is yet another proof of a complete havoc.<br>
I think that what you just wrote is just not understandable by the
usual tagger.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:530DDD0A.6070906@aol.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">So ... your contradictory replies are the exact proof that closing-hours is
badly needed.
</pre></blockquote>I do not think that it is needed …</pre>
</blockquote>
Having seen near a dozen contradictory advices to tag my example,
including in this replay, my conclusion is that it is mandatory so
that two persons write it the same way.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>