<div dir="ltr">@<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:17.27272605895996px">FrViPofm: </span>I respectfully disagree. The drinking_water tag you refer to is intended to indicate if drinking water is available at a certain facility, not whether it is safe to drink. The values in your example demonstrate this intention with "yes" and "no" comprising over 90% of the values in existence.<div>
<br></div><div>As for the example of toilets with drinkable=yes, I agree that this might be confusing. In the Wiki it would be helpful to recommend that the drinkable tag be used with amenities like fountain, spring, etc. Using it as you did above is ambiguous. For example, one would not use the term surface=concrete to describe a waterway. Although nothing forbids you to use it that way, except common sense, it is intended to be used to describe the surface of a highway. I would hope drinkability would follow that sort of usage</div>
<div><br></div><div>Dave.<br><div><br><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Vincent Pottier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vpottier@gmail.com" target="_blank">vpottier@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">Le 27/02/2014 07:18, Rudolf Martin a écrit :<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hallo,<div class=""><br>
<br>
the tag "drinkable=" is used more than 3000 times.<br>
<br>
Up today there is no clear definition about the values of this tag.<br>
<br>
I made a proposal with some possible values, according to some<br>
discussions in this mailinglist and some threads in the osm forum.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinkable" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.<u></u>org/wiki/Proposed_features/<u></u>drinkable</a><br>
<br>
Feel free to discuss.<br>
<br>
Rudolf<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
What about drinking_water used also more than 3000 times ?<br>
<a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinkable" target="_blank">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.<u></u>org/keys/drinkable</a> (~3300)<br>
<a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinking_water" target="_blank">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.<u></u>org/keys/drinking_water</a> (~3100)<br>
<br>
It seems that today "drinkable=*" is on "standalone watering objects" (fountains, springs...) and "drinking_water=*" is on other amenities or objects (shelter, toilets...).<br>
<br>
It seems also that the values should be the same.<br>
<br>
And it seems that "drinking_water=*" would fit both "standalone" objects and other objects, rather than "drinkable". What do you think of amenity=toilets + drinkable=yes ? But in contrast, "amenity=fountain + drinking_water=yes sounds good.<br>
<br>
So I would be in favour of a single "drinking_water" tag having 6400 occurrences and a migration from "drinkable" to "drinking_water" tags.<br>
It is easy to migrate softly the "drinkable" to drinking_water" by duplicating the tags in a first time and make the first obsolete.<br>
--<br>
FrViPofm<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<u></u>org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Dave Swarthout<br>Homer, Alaska<br>Chiang Mai, Thailand<br>Travel Blog at <a href="http://dswarthout.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://dswarthout.blogspot.com</a></div>
</div>