<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-03-13 19:06, Pieren wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPT3zJoye0v=90ciD9dV7aiz15VjSUyMEuj=VsPpa9xHb45j+g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Robin `ypid` Schneider <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ypid23@aol.de"><ypid23@aol.de></a> wrote:
It's unclear if your proposal is "opening_hours=SH(summer holiday)" or
"opening_hours=SH" (then you should correct the wiki because the tag
template is using the first version)
I guess you plan to update the main "opening_hours" wiki if the
proposal is accepted ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
As well as<br>
<ul>
<li>choose one of the 5 or 6 contradictory forms, each denying the
former ones, that were answered to my case that I finally
proposed unambiguously as <b>closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00</b>
(in a message followed by -1 -1 -1 and 2 or 3 more contradictory
tags)</li>
<li>if the answer to the simplified diagram I added to try to
clarify many things is really "it's wrong", say what is wrong
and correct it<br>
</li>
<li>especially, regarding <b>your</b> particular proposition <b>opening_hours="open;
Fr 14:00-22:00 off"</b></li>
<ul>
<li>explain: "open" and "closed" appear to be some new
invention [<b>of mine, </b>in the diagram]<br>
</li>
<li>write a definition for <b>off</b> or validate/correct the
definition in my diagram and explain the following replies to
this request or its usage: </li>
<ul>
<li>it's not used; <br>
</li>
<li>it's used but not like that;<br>
</li>
<li><b>off</b> must not be defined but grasped; </li>
<li>the meaning of "off" is wrong<br>
</li>
<li>"off" [must not be defined because it] has been in use for
quite some time already.</li>
<li><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Time_domains">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Time_domains</a>
explains quite well how the overall opening_hours syntax
works (why then did I have to add its URL to the main page?)<br>
</li>
</ul>
<li>write a definition or <b>open</b>, make up your mind
between, and clarify:<br>
</li>
<ul>
<li>"open" and "closed" appear to be some new invention<br>
</li>
<li>It was introduced by Netzwolf some years ago because it is
needed as
<rule_modifier> (when used together with a comment).
It is now used over 150
times to do exactly that (regex: /open\s+"/). Of course it
is an invention but
one which is required</li>
<li>make explanations for the general tagger (I'm fine with
regexp but not everybody)<br>
</li>
</ul>
<li>clarify: "Because of the definition that following rules
will overwrite previous once, times which span over midnight
have to use additional rules which are separated by comma
instead of semicolon.
"</li>
<ul>
<li>probably "override previous ones" and general syntax<br>
</li>
<li>instead of a casual remark about an example, make it a
proper explanation</li>
<ul>
<li>of the difference between comma and semicolon</li>
<li>of how rules override one another; "graspingly", ranges
specifying opening time would add themselves to opening
time and ranges specifying closing time would subtract
themselves from it, but I've seen an example for which the
range was said to both add and subtract.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>BTW, if the only reaction to <b>closing-hours=Fr 14:00-22:00</b>
is -1 -1 -1 vs all of the above (and more) for the <b>opening-hours=
?<sub>0</sub>|?<sub>1</sub>|?<sub>2</sub>|?<sub>3</sub>|?<sub>4</sub>|?<sub>5</sub></b>...
attempted equivalents, then my <b>closing-hours </b>proposition
is obviously not a question of opinion or liking but an absolute
necessity.<br>
</p>
<p>Hoping this will help,<br>
Cheers,<br>
</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
</body>
</html>