<p>In fact if I'm going to allow roads to appear twice in the relation then I can just build a continous route with no gaps and do away with the forward: and backward: bits altogether (just keeping 'grit' and 'travel' as my two roles).</p>
<p>Rob</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On 23 Mar 2014 22:07, "Rob Nickerson" <<a href="mailto:rob.j.nickerson@gmail.com">rob.j.nickerson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>
<div>Hi All,<br><br></div>I have some winter gritting/salting routes that I am trying to work out how best to tag them. I was thinking of creating a route relation, but I may need to add some new roles:<br>
<br></div>* "forward:grit" implies the gritting truck grits this road whilst travelling in the direction of the way.<br></div>* "forward:travel" implies the gritting truck drives along the direction of the way but does NOT grit it.<br>
<br></div>Is this ok?<br><br></div>I also have a concern that JOSM warns me if I try to add the same road way to the route twice. For gritting routes this is necessary - for example, grit Road A to roundabout, u-turn and travel back on Road A (but do not grit). In this example Road A would have to be added to the relation twice first as forward:grit and then as backward:travel.<br>
<br></div>Is it okay if I ignore JOSMs error in this case?<br><br></div>Regards,<br></div>Rob<br><div><div><div><div><div><br><br></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></p>