<div dir="ltr"><div>I am in the B category for my vision of OSM. I had not voted on these because they aren't important to me and i will never probably use either tag but the work you've done is good and I just now voted Yes on both.<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>While I was reading through the table of possible tourism=*_hut I noticed that you mentioned mountain_hut several times but it was not originally included in the table. I assumed you meant to say alpine_hut and edited the proposal replacing mountain_hut with alpine_hut. I am new to this and after the fact, realized I should have brought it up here first. <div>
<br></div><div>Then thinking I'd better backtrack and undo my edits, I checked with Taginfo and found that mountain_hut is used 7 times — not very often but it is there. So I took the further liberty of adding it to the list of keys in the table. My apologies if I was out of line.</div>
<div><br></div><div>But my discovery does point out the need to somehow better define what these accommodations are and unify the ones we can agree need to be unified. Those various types of huts need to be either better differentiated or if that can't be done, put together under fewer keys. I also agree that the differences between a hotel, hostel, guest_house, and motel are perhaps to fine to worry about. </div>
<div><br></div><div>More work ahead....</div><div><br></div><div>Alaska Dave</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:41 PM, nounours77 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kuessemondtaeglich@gmail.com" target="_blank">kuessemondtaeglich@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi there,<div><br></div><div>Not sure if this is the right place for this philosophical question. But starting from the comment of <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Brycenesbitt" title="User:Brycenesbitt" style="line-height:19px;color:rgb(11,0,128);font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif;text-decoration:none;background-image:none" target="_blank">Brycenesbitt</a> to my apartment-proposal "<span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif"><i>I feel this will become yet another piece of unmaintanable data in OSM." </i>and several comments I got on my boat_sharing proposal "<i>just use it, don't go through proposal process</i>" I think it's a important question. What do we define tags for?</span></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif"><b>A) OSM is just a base layer</b></span></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif">We tag just for general features of the landscape, and maybe roads. This will make a beautiful map, which then can be used as a base layer, e.g. for a holiday-apartment renting agency, which than can render all there apartments from their own private database as an overlay on OSM base layer.</span></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif">=> this will mean, "we" do not have to maintain the apartment info, nor has the provider to bother with OSM. This is much easier. But means that the information is only avaible on the agencies website, and thus there will be million places I have to look for the info.</span></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div><b><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif">B) OSM as a </span>fully featured geobased information system</b></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif">We see of OSM a a standalone, fully featured geobased information system. I can take the map in my pocket (like on the iPhone App "PocketEarth", or "OsmAnd"), and will everywhere have any kind of information. I'm driving through a village, I like it, and I want to stay. So, where are the next nice holiday-apartments around me?</span></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif">Of course, this only works, if the data is maintained and current. But: I want OSM to get important enough that every service provider offering a service to a wide enough public is just forced in his own interest to publish it's data on OSM and keep it current.</span></div>
<div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div><span style="line-height:19px;font-size:13px;font-family:undefined,sans-serif">As a conclusion for us this means: Yes, we need a defined tagging (accepted proposal) for tourism=apartment, ifnot, never ever all service providers will put their apartment on OSM. And never the Apps like PocketEarth or OsmAnd will support to render it.</span></div>
<div><span style><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">I was advised by several persons that I should just use "tourism=boat_sharing", and not bother about going through a proposal and voting process. BUT: I asked OsmAnd to render the tag, and the answer was - quite understandable: "</span></font><i style="font-family:undefined,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19px">Only officially supported tags will be rendered</i><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">". There we are again with the well know snake which bites it's tail: No data - no rendering. No rendering, nobody collects data or publishes it on OSM.</span></font></span></div>
<div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">My answer to this would be: make a reasonable, understandable, clear and clean tagging scheme, discuss it, vote it, document it. If done properly, the data will come and the rendering as well.</span></font></div>
<div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">Please, what is your vision of OSM? A or B?</span></font></div>
<div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">If A, I will stop bothering about tourism=apartment, amenity=boat_sharing, or amenity=nursery, since this are all "service informations" you can argue you can find somewhere else ...</span></font></div>
<div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">But if it's B), then we need all that to make OSM the best, most complete and inevitable geobased information system.</span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px"><br>
</span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">Thanks for your comments, and yes, I reopened the boat_sharing proposal for voting, just in case somebody wants to support me!!!</span></font></div>
<div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">Have a nice week-end,</span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px"><br>
</span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">Nounours77</span></font></div><div><font face="undefined, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px"><br></span></font></div><div>
<a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing</a></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment</a></div>
<div><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Dave Swarthout<br>Homer, Alaska<br>Chiang Mai, Thailand<br>Travel Blog at <a href="http://dswarthout.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://dswarthout.blogspot.com</a></div>
</div>