<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body ><div style='font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;'>I agree, introducing weird term instead of something obvious and widely used is bad idea. <br>Especially doing this to keep happy small group of inexperienced editors.<br><div id="1"><br>---- On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:40:01 -0700 <b>Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com></b> wrote ---- <br></div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #0000FF; padding-left: 6px; margin:0 0 0 5px"><div dir="ltr"><div><br><div>2014-06-10 12:51 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:janjko@gmail.com" target="_blank">janjko@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr">Maybe we could use a broader term that includes ATMs, like financial_kiosk or money_kiosk. I'm not saying we should deprecate amenity=atm, I'm saying amenity=financial_kiosk could be an umbrella term.<br> <br>"amenity=financial_kiosk + cash_out:EUR=yes" would be a classical ATM that dispenses Euros. Second way to tag them would be "amenity=atm"<br></div></blockquote></div><br><br>I don't think we should broaden the term and retag all atms we already collected with then 2 instead of 1 tag, instead we should invent new tags for stuff that is new. <br> <br></div><div>cheers,<br></div><div>Martin<br></div></div> _______________________________________________ <br>Tagging mailing list <br><a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a> <br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a> <br></blockquote><br></div></body></html>