<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/4.6.6">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
I'm not sure that would be right to categorize a feature like this as an attraction. I see most of the attraction=* are used to tag singular things like amusement park games. There are many attraction=animal that is vague but I assume refer to more specific things than a zoo.<BR>
What i want represent is a complex structure like this, more like a zoo, or a museum, subject to subtags like public facilities<BR>
<A HREF="http://en.acquariodicattolica.it/">http://en.acquariodicattolica.it/</A><BR>
<BR>
Lorenzo<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Il giorno dom, 24/08/2014 alle 18.29 +0700, Dave Swarthout ha scritto:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
+1 for tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
I agree with Fabrizio on the use of the two-tag structure for aquaria.
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
Cheers
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
Dave
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Fabrizio Carrai <<A HREF="mailto:fabrizio.carrai@gmail.com">fabrizio.carrai@gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Hi Lorenzo,
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. My rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags combinations. If I wants to query for all and only acquariums, a query on "attraction=acquarium" will work. Viceversa, if we rise one step above and querying for "tourism=attraction", the acquarium tagged as "tourism=acquarium" would not be reported, that is obviously not correct (the acquarium is a touristic attraction).
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Ciao
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
FabC
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
2014-08-24 3:18 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <<A HREF="mailto:lomastrolo@gmail.com">lomastrolo@gmail.com</A>>:
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
I would like to submit a new request to vote for the tag tourism=aquarium.<BR>
<BR>
The proposal was first considered approved and then excluded due to lack of feedback.<BR>
<A HREF="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Aquarium">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Aquarium</A><BR>
<BR>
Actually exists a very poor permanent page but it is non connected at any other but the proposal. I found also a german page<BR>
<A HREF="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Daquarium">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Daquarium</A><BR>
<A HREF="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Daquarium">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Daquarium</A><BR>
<BR>
tourism=aquarium is actually used 186 times. It was 187 but someone moved the one I had put in a simple tourism=attraction and this is why I am here :)<BR>
<BR>
Other similar taggings i found:<BR>
tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium. 6 times<BR>
tourism=zoo + zoo=aquarium. 3 times<BR>
tourism=attraction + aquarium=yes. 1 time<BR>
tourism=zoo + aquarium=yes. 1 time<BR>
Several aquarium=yes have been used also for pet shops<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Look forward for comments before updating the proposal page and sending the request<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR="#888888">Lorenzo</FONT><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>