<div dir="ltr">The acquarium, like the zoos, are touristic attraction. See Tripadvisor if you want to have a "reference". It also make sense to use attraction=animal instead of attraction=zoo or acquarium. Doing that you continue the progressive level of definitions. So, in my opinion you could describe the Acquario di Cattolica as follow<div>
<br></div><div>tourism=attraction</div><div>attraction=animal</div><div>name=Acquario di Cattolica</div><div><br></div><div>Than you could add more details with</div><div><br></div><div>animal=penguin;jaws;frog; etc...</div>
<div><br></div><div>or maybe a more generic </div><div><br></div><div>animal=fish</div><div><br></div><div>Following this approach, you could even think to use differrent animal=* tags for the different pavilion/tanks.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Ciao!</div><div>FabC<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-24 14:49 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lomastrolo@gmail.com" target="_blank">lomastrolo@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
I'm not sure that would be right to categorize a feature like this as an attraction. I see most of the attraction=* are used to tag singular things like amusement park games. There are many attraction=animal that is vague but I assume refer to more specific things than a zoo.<br>
What i want represent is a complex structure like this, more like a zoo, or a museum, subject to subtags like public facilities<br>
<a href="http://en.acquariodicattolica.it/" target="_blank">http://en.acquariodicattolica.it/</a><br>
<br>
Lorenzo<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Il giorno dom, 24/08/2014 alle 18.29 +0700, Dave Swarthout ha scritto:
<div><div class="h5"><blockquote type="CITE">
+1 for tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
I agree with Fabrizio on the use of the two-tag structure for aquaria.
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
Cheers
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
Dave
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Fabrizio Carrai <<a href="mailto:fabrizio.carrai@gmail.com" target="_blank">fabrizio.carrai@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
Hi Lorenzo,
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. My rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags combinations. If I wants to query for all and only acquariums, a query on "attraction=acquarium" will work. Viceversa, if we rise one step above and querying for "tourism=attraction", the acquarium tagged as "tourism=acquarium" would not be reported, that is obviously not correct (the acquarium is a touristic attraction).
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
Ciao
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
FabC
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
2014-08-24 3:18 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <<a href="mailto:lomastrolo@gmail.com" target="_blank">lomastrolo@gmail.com</a>>:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
I would like to submit a new request to vote for the tag tourism=aquarium.<br>
<br>
The proposal was first considered approved and then excluded due to lack of feedback.<br>
<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Aquarium" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Aquarium</a><br>
<br>
Actually exists a very poor permanent page but it is non connected at any other but the proposal. I found also a german page<br>
<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Daquarium" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Daquarium</a><br>
<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Daquarium" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Daquarium</a><br>
<br>
tourism=aquarium is actually used 186 times. It was 187 but someone moved the one I had put in a simple tourism=attraction and this is why I am here :)<br>
<br>
Other similar taggings i found:<br>
tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium. 6 times<br>
tourism=zoo + zoo=aquarium. 3 times<br>
tourism=attraction + aquarium=yes. 1 time<br>
tourism=zoo + aquarium=yes. 1 time<br>
Several aquarium=yes have been used also for pet shops<br>
<br>
<br>
Look forward for comments before updating the proposal page and sending the request<br>
<br>
<br>
<font color="#888888">Lorenzo</font><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><i>Fabrizio</i><br></div></div>
</div></div></div>