<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br></div><div><br>Il giorno 18/set/2014, alle ore 09:30, Martin Vonwald <<a href="mailto:imagic.osm@gmail.com">imagic.osm@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Not good. Contrary to other people I think that the readability of tags is most important, otherwise we could simply use tags like ptn=pnx or road=flying_saucer and define that those tags mean "grass". Both could be processed perfectly fine but obviously doesn't make any sense at all.<br><br></div><div>A while ago I wrote down some thoughts about a cleanup of landuse/natural/surface with the intention of clearly separating those tags and make it more easy to understand their meaning. I have to admit that I lost interest in this area so my writing just sits there and waits for someone to adopt it: <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/landcover">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/landcover</a> . The first section "When to use ..." would be the most important in your case. Therefore I would recommend landcover=grass in your case. If this area is also used to e.g. produce hay I would also use landuse=meadow.</div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>+1 to everything, especially the "clearly separating" part</div><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>MArtin</div></body></html>