<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-24 16:32 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:info@matthijsmelissen.nl" target="_blank">info@matthijsmelissen.nl</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> Nameless object, with brand (for example petrol station).<br>
> IMHO it should be tagged brand=*, without name.<br>
<br>
</span>That would cause backwards-compatibility problems for all data<br>
consumers</blockquote></div><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-1, if the name tag has values that aren't actually the name of the tagged instance it should be removed. This is not about compatibility, but cleaning up "tagging for the *-data-consumer".<br><br>If someone had added "name=beachvolleyball pitch" and natural=beach to beach volleyball pitches it would also cause "backwards-compatibility problems for all data consumers" if we changed the tagging to leisure=pitch and removed the name tag (i.e. those pitches would vanish from products of dataconsumers that don't render pitches but beaches).<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">IMHO the data consumers (and editors etc.) will update their projects (btw.: if they haven't already, not that the brand tag was supernew, or that this kind of tagging isn't advocated in the wiki since 4 years: <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:brand&oldid=538574">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:brand&oldid=538574</a> ).<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">cheers,<br>Martin<br></div></div>