<div dir="ltr">Sounds like an analogous situation to the difference between State Highways and State Routes in Oregon. The shields always have the state route, the blade markers at bridges and some milemarkers list both the route and the highway. Not all state highways are members of state routes (since roads in state parks, notably, are state highways, as are most ocean beaches as they're open to vehicles). This kind of lends some strong credence to my opinion that it's time to bury the dinosaur of having route refs on ways, that way the way ref can actually <i>be</i> the <i>actual</i> reference of the way...</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:15 PM, James Mast <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rickmastfan67@hotmail.com" target="_blank">rickmastfan67@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">I've been handling the 'four-digit' SR's here in PA another way. Technically, the routes are 'somewhat' signed, but in a way that people wouldn't normally see or pay attention to except in a few places. These routes normally get a little white square box on the sides of the road. [1] They also can 'sometimes' appear on street blades depending on the area. [2] So, what I've been doing is tagging the 4-digit routes with the following tag 'ref:penndot=SR ****'. (Example [3]) I think that tag works perfectly, especially if somebody wants to add the state route for a bannered highway (US-19 Truck in the North Hills of Pittsburgh is 'SR 4003'). It keeps the info together, plus IMO, works better here since they aren't 'true' unsigned highways unlike in several Western states where you can't find any reference to a US highway on an Interstate most of the time.<span class=""><br><br>-James<br><br><br>[1] - <a href="http://goo.gl/maps/RsXme" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/maps/RsXme</a><br></span>[2] - <a href="http://goo.gl/maps/w0Xoq" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/maps/w0Xoq</a> (While it might be hard to read, that's 'SR 3025' posted on that blade)<br>[3] - <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19597194" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19597194</a> <br><div class="hm HOEnZb"><br></div><div><div class="hm HOEnZb"><hr>Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:16:01 -0600<br>From: <a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org" target="_blank">baloo@ursamundi.org</a><br>To: <a href="mailto:rickmastfan67@hotmail.com" target="_blank">rickmastfan67@hotmail.com</a><br>CC: <a href="mailto:talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>; <a href="mailto:burkejf3@gmail.com" target="_blank">burkejf3@gmail.com</a></div><div><div class="h5"><br>Subject: Re: [Talk-us] State highway refs (was Re: New I.D Feature)<br><br><div dir="ltr">Someone in the Valley Forge area also tagged refs on a LOT of four-digit State Routes that aren't signed...seems like this belongs in a relation with unsigned_ref and the ref should be unsigned_ref. Yes, I know they're on the bridge placards and what not, but there's no route shields on these.</div><div><br><div>On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:58 PM, James Mast <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rickmastfan67@hotmail.com" target="_blank">rickmastfan67@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">Same thing goes with Florida. Just the state outline.<br><br>Heck, in Pennsylvania, originally on BGS's before we started to use the Keystone shield, we used the 'PA' abbreviation (one such sign that still stands [1]). However, now on the little white reference mileage signs [2] that PennDOT posts on roads they maintain, it says 'SR' (even on Interstates). However, PennDOT recently posted a nice little gem on PA-28 @ Exit #6 going both directions that goes back in time and mentions the 'PA' on the sign. [3] There are at least 3 of these signs (2 going SB, at least 1 going NB).<br><br>-James<br><br>[1] - <a href="http://goo.gl/maps/RsXme" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/maps/RsXme</a> <br>[2] - <a href="http://goo.gl/maps/ARr9s" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/maps/ARr9s</a> <br>[3] - <a href="http://youtu.be/W3xI5Y8eRk4?t=2m1s" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/W3xI5Y8eRk4?t=2m1s</a> (the video needs to be paused right here @ 2m1s to see the sign clearly)<br><br><br><div><hr>From: <a href="mailto:burkejf3@gmail.com" target="_blank">burkejf3@gmail.com</a><br>Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 00:55:13 -0500<br>To: <a href="mailto:talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><span><br>Subject: Re: [Talk-us] State highway refs (was Re: New I.D Feature)<br><br></span><div><div>In Georgia, (almost?) all state roads are signed with the state outline and the highway number, but no "GA" or "Georgia" text with it. Occasionally you might see "State Road" or "State Route" printed on the sign in addition to the state outline. In some very rural areas, I think there might still be a few un-logoed signs, but probably not many. <br>
<br>
-jack<br><br><div>On November 30, 2014 5:58:53 PM EST, Minh Nguyen <<a href="mailto:minh@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us" target="_blank">minh@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us</a>> wrote:<blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<pre>On 2014-11-30 10:41, stevea wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #729fcf;padding-left:1ex"> My two cents: I must say that here in California, I've made it a habit<br> to remove the "County Route" designation (CR) which precedes a ref<br> number in our County Route system. For example, NE2 (a banned-from-OSM<br> former contributor for those unfamiliar with that history) entered ref<br> tags for many G2, N1... county routes as "CR G2" and "CR N1." That, in<br> my opinion, is so redundant (as G and N and A and S... are well-known<br> multi-county/regional-within-California county highway networks) as to<br> be true clutter. People in California do know (and routing software,<br> renderers... SHOULD know) that A1, G2, N4 and S16 are county routes in a<br> lettered system where each letter represents a cluster of counties...at<br> least in California.<br></blockquote><br>Some northwest Ohio counties post shields along section line roads that <br>say A, B, C, etc. So far I've been tagging them like "CR A", even though <br>you'd be hard-pressed to find that style anywhere outside of OSM. <br>Instead of reducing ambiguity, I wonder if the "CR" may cause very mild <br>confusion, for example when a router tells its user to turn onto "CR R".<br><br><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #729fcf;padding-left:1ex"> Also, while "SR" (for "State Route" in California and other states) is<br> still legally correct, I still might change for consistency's sake any<br> "SR" prefix I see in a highway route relation ref tag to be "CA"<br> instead. So, while "SR 17" is correct, I much prefer "CA 17" and will<br> change it to that if I see SR in a California highway route relation ref<br> tag.<br></blockquote><br>Yes, usage is different in California. I've only ever seen "SR" on <br>signage a few times, in rather obscure places. But in Ohio, it's ubiquitous.<br><br><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #729fcf;padding-left:1ex"> I agree with what we (as OSM volunteers entering/editing data in our<br> map) now do, as well as what map styles/renderers and routing engines<br> do, as Minh notes above: "recognize the state abbreviation, SR or SH."<br> Yes, Michigan still has its M- routes, and I think OSM (both its human<br> editors and software components) should just learn to cope with that<br> (plus perhaps a few other states) as exceptions to this largely (though<br> not completely) applicable rule. I believe we are pretty much there,<br> but we still have edge cases, data in the map and newer contributors who<br> are not completely familiar with these conventions in the USA.<br> Discussing it here helps, though wiki documentation and taginfo data<br> which are consistent across
the fifty states is better.<br></blockquote><br>My response to anyone who wants more consistency is that route relations <br>are the way forward. They may be painful now but they make the data a <br>lot less subject to interpretation.<br></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Typos courtesy of fancy auto-spell technology. <br></div></div><span>_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a></span></div> </div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-us mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a></div></div></div> </div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>