<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>Am 18.12.2014 um 05:04 schrieb <a href="mailto:tagging-request@openstreetmap.org">tagging-request@openstreetmap.org</a>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">On 11/08/2014 04:47 PM, Pee Wee wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">We are writing to you for advice on what steps we should or could take<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">next. The situation is best summarized as:<br></blockquote><br>[...]<br><br>After some consideration I have today asked user ulamm to refrain from<br>making any edits to wiki pages unless he has first proposed the edit on<br>the matching talk page and found broad support.<br><br>Any edit activity not conforming to this rule will lead to an account ban.<br><br>Data Working Group does not usually get involved in wiki edit wars but<br>in this case the wiki edit war has a direct connection to disputed edits<br>going on in our database,</span></blockquote></div><br><div>@ Frederik</div><div>Everybody shall know that I've asked for your moderation several times this year, myself.</div><div>Unfortunately, your citation of PeeWee's mail does not tell, who really had complained of which of my edits.</div><div>• Most of them were not at all inovative, but the elimination of errors (shared lane vs. suggestiestrook vs. Schutzstreifen) and the conversion of the DE-articles on bicycle featuires from a labyrinth of partliy contradicting guidelines into a consistant manual.</div><div>• An important subject was the explanation of what kinds of cycling facilities exist in reality. If people have wrong ideas on them they cannot map them correctly.</div><div>• Before started to edit in Wiki articles, I had edited in talks.</div><div>• With my main edits, I've invited everybody to improve them, such as [[DE_talk:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Gründe für meine Überarbeitung]]</div><div>• On <span class="history-user"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:PeeWee32" title="User:PeeWee32" class="mw-userlink">PeeWee32</a></span> favourite subject, the tag bicycle=sidepath, I had constrictive discussions with him, Mateusz Konieczny and <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Jgpacker" title="User:Jgpacker" class="mw-userlink">Jgpacker</a> between <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath&oldid=1094037" title="Talk:Tag:bicycle=use sidepath" class="mw-changeslist-date">12:09, 8 October 2014</a> and <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath&oldid=1110490" title="Talk:Tag:bicycle=use sidepath" class="mw-changeslist-date">08:48, 18 November 2014</a></div><div>•• Before my edtis on that article, part of the illustrations were misleading, as most German optional cycletracks have no sign at all, and bicycle=no as a counterpart of bicycle=use sidepath affords a photo of a discriminative cycling ban, not of a pedestrian zone.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Ulrich</div> <br></body></html>