<html><head></head><body>+1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default value from the :lanes proposal.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Am 13. Januar 2015 13:45:24 MEZ, schrieb Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm@gmail.com>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sg.forum@gmx.de" target="_blank">sg.forum@gmx.de</a>></span>:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes defines es the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane and bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example.<br /></div></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">That's correct. AFAIK it is common understanding, that some kind of way with access tags bicycle=designated and vehicle=no (or similar) is more or less identical to a cyclelane. <br /><br />My problems with cycleway:lanes=...|lane|none|... are:<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">* The value none is not specified for the key cycleway<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">* The tag cycleway=lane tells use, there is a cyclelane, but it doesn't tell us where.<br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Best regards,<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />Tagging mailing list<br />Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br /><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.</body></html>