<HTML><BODY>Andrew, you don't answered a question how to compare addr points to poi points,<br>and chose is there one address or two or more. <br><br>Also there is no chance to map building with addresses with node <br>(without polygonal geometry, in case you can't draw outline accurate enough).<br><br>> This problem is already solved by bare address nodes. There's<br> > absolutely no need to introduce an additional ugly complex scheme just<br> > to avoid spatial lookups into the database.<br><br>Please answer the questions before making such pathetic statements. <br><br><br>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:54:43 +0100 от Andrew Shadura <andrew@shadura.me>:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #0857A6; margin:10px; padding:0 0 0 10px;">
<div id="">
<div class="js-helper js-readmsg-msg">
<style type="text/css"></style>
<div>
<base target="_self" href="https://e.mail.ru/">
<div id="style_14216613100000000518_BODY">On 19 January 2015 at 10:49, Dmitry Kiselev <<a href="/compose?To=dkiselev@osm.me">dkiselev@osm.me</a>> wrote:<br>
> yep it's all about "buildings who have multiple addresses valid for all<br>
> suites."<br>
<br>
This problem is already solved by bare address nodes. There's<br>
absolutely no need to introduce an additional ugly complex scheme just<br>
to avoid spatial lookups into the database. This is something which is<br>
easily done in the software, there's no need to put burden of<br>
maintaining this stuff on humans.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Cheers,<br>
Andrew<br>
</div>
<base target="_self" href="https://e.mail.ru/">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></BODY></HTML>