<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>> From: tagging-request@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 135<br>> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org<br>> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:15:37 +0000<BR><div><br>> What do you think? Should the length tag be used with ways and<br>> relations where the length can be calculated from the geometry itself?<br>> Am I missing something?<br><font face="Times New Roman">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style='line-height: 115%; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: NL;'>Like Francois said, keep it alive.<o:p></o:p></span></p><font face="Times New Roman">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: NL;'>The length and width are
perfect keys or tools to determine the size of a bridge, in case of a heavy
load. That the tags don’t have heavy users, too bad, we could do better. But
everyone tags what he thinks is useful.<o:p></o:p></span></p><font face="Times New Roman">
</font></div> </div></body>
</html>