<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 28/01/2015 6:53 PM, Martin Vonwald
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKjckyPeTu8A=n27o_1=-pzndGSYNLyu1H7iwvhPf8JzP5QROA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi!<br>
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-01-28 8:48 GMT+01:00 Warin <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I note
that"if the medium of a pipeline you are tagging is not
listed here, please choose a meaningful value at your
own discretion."However that will lead to multiple
values all meaning the same thing or be too restrictive.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>From this and many other comments from you, I have to
tell you, that - in my opinion - you have not understood
OpenStreetMap.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Should this be a 'RFC' as in a request for comment?<br>
According to taginfo the values in decreasing use are
water (30%), gas, heat, sewrage, oil, hot water (20%),
electricity (should be 'cable' according to the wiki),
sewage (3%), oxygen, coal, lng, fuel.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Choose one, use it, document it.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I note This tag has a status "unspecified' .. that
probaly means it has not been voted on here.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>See what I mean?<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">No offence intended.<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
No offence taken I can assure you!!! :) <br>
<br>
I do understand OSM is a conglomerate .. all pulling in different
directions. I think that is a good thing .. but the end result needs
to be coordinated so the output can be used. I'm trying to point out
that what one person or group thinks is not necessarily what is
'best' what ever that may mean. <small><big>And I'm pulling my way
.. feel free to pull another. In fact do so. Only that way will
OSM get 'better'. </big><br>
</small><br>
I casting about for the value to use for non-potable water .. for
eventual use in the tap tag. I'll get on to the 'substance' tag
author and see what they think .. together with something on the
voltage of the cable when used with pipeline, oh and hot water. <br>
<br>
--------------------<br>
Be warned .. I'll need a new tag for the handle on the tap .. some
of them around here are 'tamper proof .. meaning you need a 'special
tool' (a portable handle/key to fit) that prevents public use. <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>