<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..."<br>> <br>> Today's Topics:<br><br>> 5. Re: length= (François Lacombe)<br><br>> Message: 5<br>> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:13:38 +0100<br>> From: François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux@gmail.com><br>> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"<br>> <tagging@openstreetmap.org><br>> Subject: Re: [Tagging] length=<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAG0ygLcExWgiFbGqMV=Hv3RT-wf3RS-3RCEPE=UfT1QFkom5Ug@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>> <br>> Since OSM editing tools aren't AutoCAD you can't be 100% precise on the<br>> geometry.<br>> Some small features can actually be summarized as nodes when drawing their<br>> shape sounds irrelevant regarding the cluttering it introduces.<br>> <br>> I'm sorry that was trivial for me.<br>> I won't draw a circle for a 5cm diameter pole and so on...<br>> <br>> That's why tags are intended for several kind of primitives instead of only<br>> one sometimes.<BR>> *François Lacombe*<BR><font face="Times New Roman">
</font><BR><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;'>Francois if you’re using JOSM you’re be able to work
up till 0,06 - 0,04 =0,02 m accuracy and with the other tools flip, turn and so
on the complete structure, so I don’t agree, your able to work quit accurate up
to building standards.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><font face="Times New Roman"></font> <BR> </div></body>
</html>