<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Maybe there is a need for something like… a tag for office=* which may cover the different public or employee facing building types</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">where the common facilities you would find in each category would be taggable, so you can tag a point or a building as certain types of facilities.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">office=human_resources</div><div class="">office=reception (no desk, because it could be a desk, building, hut, area)</div><div class="">office=records</div><div class="">office=break_area</div><div class="">office=changing_room</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I’m having difficulty about what “sections” or office_centric amenities could exist outside of existing general amenities, so maybe this is a crap idea - but it would the the alternative would to be to put it into amenity, or ignore the “commercial” reception desks (which is a big mistake, I think) and make hospitality=* key (for hotels, camps, etc), but I think it would be similarly difficult to fill out a that tag either, as it would be full of general amenities (gym, laundry, restaurant,) hospitality=item_check is the only one I can think of off the top of my head. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">so maybe amenity=reception(_desk) is the best idea. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Javbw</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:20 AM, Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" class="">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/02/2015 3:41 AM, Kotya Karapetyan
wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CAK2dJ-yGjyUJzSOqJf1jqSZaO2LJX=-6L4PRxHUDmT8qbABVTw@mail.gmail.com" type="cite" class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<pre wrap="" class="">Amenity is the best fit for this tag.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="" class="">
I disagree. (Usually that just means "I didn't find anything better")
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="" class="">+1
"Amenity" is very vague in general (), and a lot of things can be
marked as such. So I'd prefer to use it only when it's an obvious
choice or there is nothing better.
What about using "office"?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
<big class="">An office - such as office=government may well have a reception
desk. If you mark both you will have an office inside an office
unless you do an internal multipollygon .. lot of work for what
maybe a single node to mark the location of a reception desk</big>?
<br class="">
<br class="">
<blockquote cite="mid:CAK2dJ-yGjyUJzSOqJf1jqSZaO2LJX=-6L4PRxHUDmT8qbABVTw@mail.gmail.com" type="cite" class="">
<pre wrap="" class="">I was also surprised to discover that there was not key for "booth" in
OSM. (And of course all currently available booths ended in "amenity"
:) ) Shall we maybe introduce it?
Cheers,
Kotya
<big class="">
</big></pre>
</blockquote>
<big class=""><br class="">
The only 'booth' I can think of to map would be an 'information
booth' .. and that already exists .. twice over !<br class="">
<br class="">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information</a><br class="">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/information">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/information</a></big><br class="">
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Tagging mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br class="">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>