<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 14/02/2015 11:43 AM, David Bannon
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1423874633.26858.25.camel@davos-LT"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote:
.....
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
I'd split the voting up into
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">.....
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">waste, collection is the more frequent case.
.... waste_collection
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="mid:1423874633.26858.25.camel@davos-LT"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by
time I responded. Sigh ...
When you say, "split the voting", are you suggesting that its
sufficiently 'ripe' to be asking for a formal (ie in the wiki) vote
yet ? Bearing in mind we have had only you, me and Dave S contribute to
the discussion ?
David
</pre>
<big><br>
</big></blockquote>
<big><br>
You asked for 'lets have some hands up' .. that implies a vote of
sorts.. .. but I'd not move to a formal vote yet? <br>
<br>
I'd like some more peoples thoughts on the issue and words.. more
comments.<big> </big>Support .. and criticism .. just an
interest. </big><br>
<big><br>
There is a required minimum time for comments - two weeks .. with
a name change to waste_collection perhaps two weeks from the
change of name? I'd suggest a new proposal page with the new name
.. provided there is some support for the name .. apart from you
& me? And any better names put forward? </big><br>
</body>
</html>