<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/02/2015 8:32 AM, David Bannon
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1424208742.25257.9.camel@davos-LT" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:30 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It's hard to go far wrong with a dedicated tag for a feature with:
1) A strong clear definition
2) That features prominently on printed recreation maps, with a
standard icon.
3) Has a large community of mappers behind it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">OK, then lets write up a formal proposal. As I said, I'm not opposed,
just sceptical that it will succeed.
Do you think such a tag will need its own subtags ? I'm thinking of
things like fee, access to large vehicles, cassette v holding tank, hmm,
what else ?
Do you propose something like -
amenity=dump_station
dump_station=fee
or
amenity=dump_station:fee=yes</pre>
</blockquote>
<big><br>
Should not the present tags be used?!<br>
<br>
fee= as per <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee</a> </big><br>
<big>That avoids a lot of duplication throughout OSM. </big><br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1424208742.25257.9.camel@davos-LT" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Anyway, I'll support any reasonable proposal, we need a promotable
solution.
David
PS - I suspect we can do better than any f the existing ones you listed
below :-)
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sanidumps.com/">http://www.sanidumps.com/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://openpois.net/">http://openpois.net/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.poi-factory.com/">http://www.poi-factory.com/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.rvdumps.com/">http://www.rvdumps.com/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rvdumpsites.net/about/">http://rvdumpsites.net/about/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/maint/ra/RVStations.htm">http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/maint/ra/RVStations.htm</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dot.state.mn.us/restareas/pdf/dumpstationslist.pdf">http://www.dot.state.mn.us/restareas/pdf/dumpstationslist.pdf</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<big>And then the proposal should follow the existing situation.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal</a><br>
<br>
so tag</big><br>
<big><br>
amenity=waste_disposal -exists<br>
waste=dump_station</big> <big> - new </big><br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------<br>
<big>That is how I see it .. either;<br>
<br>
</big><big>you stick with the present system i.e.all waste goes
under either </big><big>amenity=waste_basket o</big>r <big>amenity=waste_disposal
</big><br>
<br>
OR <br>
<big><br>
go with a new top level tag ... waste_collection=*</big> <br>
<br>
-----------------------------<br>
<big>To say there is no support for a new top level tag
waste_collection=* based on the talk here .. well there are lots
of people not saying anything .. possibly they have nothing to
add, or just see it as a good idea and may vote later or see it as
a lost cause. I too would like to see them speak up - any
direction they chose. But so few speak up. a few more vote. </big><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>