<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">I think it should be k kept under attraction, because a large mappable maze is certainly an interest of tourists - especially if it is part of a larger complex. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Then it would be </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">tourism=attraction</div><div class="">attraction=maze</div><div class="">maze=hedge</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">or attraction:maze=hedge instead of attraction=maze + maze=hedge (so a generic maze would be attraction:maze=yes) I actually like this better. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I don’t know which is better, but it certainly feels that any large maze - new or historic - is a form of attraction, so it should go into that - Especially if we are going to have a definition for special gardens in there as well. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I think we can just label it historic or heritage or something if it fits for the maze </div><div class=""><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic" class="">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">> <span style="font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 19.200000762939453px;" class="">Other: wall, boundary_stone, well, boundary_marker, folly</span></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">is a maze a “folly”? I think it is. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class="">so</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class="">tourism=attraction</div><div class="">attraction:maze=hedge</div><div class="">historic=other</div></div></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Javbw</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 19, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" class="">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/02/2015 8:15 PM, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CAC9LFPcJVBC0vCN1fYp9EtqnrGt_+QvHGAB3QOGAbR-TU0-B7g@mail.gmail.com" type="cite" class="">
<pre wrap="" class="">The problem with
tourism=attraction
attraction=maze
Is that attraction is a top level tag, not a subtag of tourism=attraction.
So maybe:
tourism=attraction
type=maze
subtypes=labyrinth;hedge
</pre>
</blockquote>
<big class=""><br class="">
I'd do<br class="">
<br class="">
tourism=maze ... similar to zoo, theme park, museum, artwork.<br class="">
<br class="">
and if necessary sub tag under that .. there are lots of different
types .. see wikipedia <br class="">
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze</a></big><br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Tagging mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br class="">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>