<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <<a href="mailto:bryce2@obviously.com" class="">bryce2@obviously.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra">If it's of interest to outsiders it seems like an attraction. Thus how about:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><b class="">tourism=attraction</b></div><div class="gmail_extra"><b class="">attraction:type=maze</b></div><div class="gmail_extra"><b class="">name=Happy Tunnel Kiddie Maze</b></div><div class="gmail_extra"><b class="">website=<a href="http://maze.example.org/" class="">http://maze.example.org/</a></b></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>What other information would be in attraction:*=* keyspace?</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Maybe it would be a good chance to add some kind of “sub-attraction” attribute - as the name of theme parks routinely gets pushed out of rendering because of the plethora of attraction tags around it. </div><div><br class=""></div><div>If we could designate a tag, like attraction:location=Theme_park - or something to denote that it is part of a larger park (as opposed to a ferris wheel or roller coaster sitting by itself as a stand alone attraction) - it might make rendering decisions easier (AKA don’t render this type attraction name until Z18 or something.)</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Or is that something all done with relations or whatnot? I’m unsure of where things cross from “done with tags” to “done with relations” to “done with the rendering code”. </div><div><br class=""></div><div>Javbw</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">You want all those similar features (maze/tube hill/ride/garden/water park/whatever) to show up on a tourism/visitor type map.</div><div class="gmail_extra">This is also a clear case where the existing maze tags could be mass retagged to the new scheme.<br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">-----------------------</div><div class="gmail_extra">You just want to be clear if a given feature is PART of a larger "attraction" (e.g.</div><div class="gmail_extra">one ride in a water park), or if it's the high level feature (e.g. the water park itself).</div><div class="gmail_extra">See also <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=theme_park" target="_blank" class="">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park</a></div><div class="gmail_extra">and the associated tagging.</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Tagging mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br class="">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>