<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/02/2015 9:59 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTAcwxm6cjfyh1Dr65NDE6HFqDp2eGN-rxYZqnVCSuNYDA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-02-18 23:09 GMT+01:00 Warin <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <tt>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection"
target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection</a></tt></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">I believe there are still some issues
with this proposal. <br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">For one the concept is still not
clear/logical with the currently suggested values<br>
IMHO you should decide whether this tag will work like
waste_collection=type of collected waste or like
waste_collection=type of waste collectors (object). Currently
you are mixing up those two (e.g. "cigarettes" is a kind of
waste, "household_bin" is a kind of object to collect waste),<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Cigarette bin then? It is what I was thinking of .. and I think I
found it in one of my searches on OSM values? Don't recall. <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_receptacle">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_receptacle</a><br>
<br>
I'm for objects .. some objects do state the type of waste sometimes
as that is for later processing, sometimes as it is part of there
function. <br>
<br>
<br>
Ok .. so I could append 'bin' to all the solid types .. but for
liquids .. what? '<span class="st">Receptacle</span>'? Is that
acceptable? <br>
<span class="st"><em></em></span><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTAcwxm6cjfyh1Dr65NDE6HFqDp2eGN-rxYZqnVCSuNYDA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
Secondly, the chosen generic term looses scale / size
information, compared to introduced tags like waste_bin.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Oh.. how big is a waste bin? Some are small .. like the above
cigarette bins to large like skip bins ... So the word bun to me
does not define an expected size. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTAcwxm6cjfyh1Dr65NDE6HFqDp2eGN-rxYZqnVCSuNYDA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
The suggested key waste_collection=* doesn't give any
information on the amount you can dispose at these places. Are
these to be used on big plants/centres as well as on small
bins? Then I'd expect to have another subtag to denote the
size / amount of material you can dispose. E.g. for building
material or earth you'd expect to be able to bring lorry loads
of material, while for drugs or batteries the most common
features are only accepting household quantities.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">cheers,<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
And a sub tag for fee, opening hours etc .. <br>
I too would like a 'volume' tag .. but that is another proposal....
as it could be used for other things .. capacity is used for parking
... just a number without unit. 'Volume' would need a unit ..
perhaps litres .. as I say another proposal .. with separate
discussion. There is mention of 'size' or 'volume' on the proposal
page .. but I've not taken it further. <br>
<br>
I note that building does not in it self define an expected size ..
having an area is a start but it then nneds a height.. So a volume
sub key would follow present OSM practice. <br>
</body>
</html>