<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/03/2015 4:50 AM, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAC9LFPcJ=735Q2vkWH34uwZngnWQw98-HyzZd3BH6xa+N1u+BA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:37 AM,
Andreas Goss <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:andig88@t-online.de" target="_blank">andig88@t-online.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Either use a site relation<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</span>
Then why isn't this in the proposal?</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I never envisaged a reception desk that would be off the site. Or
place in such a way that it could not be seen to be part of a site.
<br>
<br>
What is the ratio of having to use a 'site relation' occuring to the
simple case ? Less than 10%.. ? <br>
<br>
I'll add a link to site relation ... there are other links that
could be added too.. like urls, phone numbers, opening hours,
checked etc etc .. the possibilities of things that could be used
are large. I've only included those that I thought to be common, not
rare. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAC9LFPcJ=735Q2vkWH34uwZngnWQw98-HyzZd3BH6xa+N1u+BA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think the negative votes followed from a poorly
formatted and confusing proposal.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks for the negativity. Very helpfull. <br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>