<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Warin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">inscription<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    note (not rendered .. for use by mappers to make notes to other
    mappers ? thus not required to be rendered?)</blockquote></div><br>Visible in a popup in geschichtskarten for historical items.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">But you were talking about all renderers I thought. Now you seem happy that there is 1 renderer showing the feature/data ? </div><div class="gmail_extra">I'm still convinced that features that people want to map will be mapped, regardless of the state of the tagging proposal.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">m.</div></div>