<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Additions to that page, I'd think, should be proposed separately.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-</div><div class="gmail_extra">The utility undergrounding RFC proposes tagging for a similar "regional default value".</div><div class="gmail_extra"><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Quickly_Marking_Utility_Wires">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Quickly_Marking_Utility_Wires</a><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Eventually the tools will catch up :-)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">But that case is simpler.  Smoking rules depend on the area AND the establishment type:</div><div class="gmail_extra">  smoking_default:yes=restaurant;cafe</div><div class="gmail_extra">  smoking_default:unknown=bar<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">And the legal definition of the restriction may not mach OSM's definition (e.g. smoking</div><div class="gmail_extra">maybe allowed in certain bars owned by people who donate money to a particular party ;-).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I say the definition of the tag should simply state that legally mandated smoking status should</div><div class="gmail_extra">either not be tagged at all, or given <b>smoking=per_local_law</b>.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div>