<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/03/2015 7:25 AM, Jan van Bekkum
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+9j5RQchFzuitYmVRwkeKOcMFEWXPE_xeGQBhY91uc_oh+e9A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Using
a relation in any case you see all amenities: when I find a
campground on the map I see a restaurant in its direct
neighbourhood, etc., even if the relation isn't handled at all
by the renderer. I am not so afraid of mapping relations. The
site relation is very simple.</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+9j5RQchFzuitYmVRwkeKOcMFEWXPE_xeGQBhY91uc_oh+e9A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">If
I don't know the exact position of the buildings I just use
different nodes close to one another; this is not worse than
using a single node for a campground.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
I think it is better than the single node as it makes it easy for a
mapper to move the relevant node to the correct position when known.
<br>
<br>
Need to start another topic for this? That would separate it out
from "established, unofficial and wild campings".<br>
</body>
</html>