<div dir="ltr">I know the problem, but while in the past we might have made new tags for green sheep with 6 legs, the other extreme is to force everything where you can stay with in a tent under tourism=camp_site.<div>That's what I understood from Martin's mail, they are too different, not that he does not want you to map scout camps.</div><div><br></div><div>There is no "best", for each case we have to see whether it is appropriate to try to come up with a general tag that fits many objects and which requires subtags or just come up with new tag on top level.</div><div>IMHO, scout camps are too different from camp sites that we could introduce a new tag for them.</div><div><br></div><div>Similar: holiday stays, tents (or barracks)</div><div>different: certain age groups, supervised, private</div><div><br></div><div>there are probably other similarities or differences. Another (the most ?) important thing is that I cannot imagine that when you looking for a scout camp that you are interested to see where the camp sites are (or vice versa).</div><div>This is different from parkings, if I need to park my car near an office, I'll be looking for the private parking of that office or a parking open to the public. I need both. </div><div><br></div><div>regards</div><div><br></div><div>m<br><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Warin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com" target="_blank">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><div class="h5">
<div>On 3/04/2015 5:05 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Bryce
Nesbitt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bryce2@obviously.com" target="_blank">bryce2@obviously.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Scout
camps ARE landmarks often, and valid destinations, even if
they don't offer services to the general public.</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
This is not an argument to map it as tourism=camp_site, this
is just a argument to map it. While I agree with the latter
(mapping it), I wonder whether there are enough similarities
with other camp sites to map them as tourism=camp_site</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Right now I have the impression that
every new tag has to be super general and that you need to add
dozens of extra tags to understand what you are actually
talking about. ( a bit exaggerated, I know).</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">When you make a map to show all camp
sites, are you interested in showing the scout camps ? I doubt
so.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Why not just map it as
leisure/tourism/... = scout_camp ? What's wrong with that ?<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Wrong? Nothing I can see. <br>
<br>
Best? Another question. <br>
<br>
Some want top down tagging. Some want tags for green sheep with 6
legs. <br>
<br>
What is best? Without a general statement of what is preferable no
one has any basis for a decision. <br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>