<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-04-24 11:34 GMT+02:00 Florian LAINEZ <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:winnerflo@free.fr" target="_blank">winnerflo@free.fr</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div><div><ol><li>Describe the classes: they are not standard internationally and I think we should avoid them</li></ol></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br>+1<br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><ol><li>Describe the local classes: not suitable worldwide<br></li></ol></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>as long as you have correct country / standard namespaces, you can do this and will have the information that is needed (but likely will have to be normalized by the data consumer). This seems easy for the mapper though (he can tag what he sees).<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><ol><li></li><li>Describe the combustible: it requires to understand the kind of fire that is suitable for an extinguisher : It can be subjective as the brakets denote in the table here <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_extinguisher#United_Kingdom" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_extinguisher#United_Kingdom</a><br>Also we would potentially have multiple keys e.g. <tt style="background-color:rgb(221,221,238);white-space:pre-wrap" dir="ltr">fire_extinguisher_class=</tt><tt style="background-color:rgb(221,221,238);white-space:pre-wrap" dir="ltr">ordinary_combustibles;flammable liquid;electricity</tt></li></ol></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>we could have a table in the wiki that defines human readable values for the classes that you can see on the extinguisher, e.g.<br>Comparison of fire classes
American
European
UK
Australian/Asian
Fuel/heat source
Class A
Class A
Class A
Class A
Ordinary combustibles
Class B
Class B
Class B
Class B
Flammable liquids
Class C
Class C
Class C
Flammable gases
Class C
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Class E
Electrical equipment
Class D
Class D
Class D
Class D
Combustible metals
Class K
Class F
Class F
Class F
Cooking oil or fat<br><br><br>The tag name could also be more explicit, e.g. <br></div><div>fire_extinguisher_for_fire_type<br></div><div>or<br></div><div>for_fire_type<br><br></div><div>the values could be<br></div><div>ordinary_combustibles (or maybe "generic", "normal", "ordinary"?), liquids, gases, electrical, metals, fat<br><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><ol><li>Describe the kind of combustible: again it requires to understand the kind of fire that is suitable for an extinguisher<br></li></ol></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>again, could be a translation table in the wiki to normalize local standard to normalized human readable value<br></div><div><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><ol><li></li><li>Describe the type of powder: could be a good solution but the bad think is that we would potentially have multiple keys e.g. <tt style="background-color:rgb(221,221,238);white-space:pre-wrap" dir="ltr">fire_extinguisher_class=water;foam;dry_powder</tt></li></ol></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>the usual solution for avoiding multiple values is putting them in the key, e.g.<br></div><div>fire_extinguisher_agent:water=yes<br><br></div><div>or more linguistically correct<br></div><div>extinguishing_agent:water=yes<br></div><div><br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>My choice would be "5. Describe the type of powder" with the following keys:<br><ul><li>water</li><li>foam</li><li>dry_powder</li><li>co2</li><li>wet_chemical</li><li>class_D</li><li>halon<br></li></ul></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div></div></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">These seem to be different types of descriptions, <br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">water, co2 and halon are describing the chemical material or group of materials<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">foam, dry_powder, wet_chemical are describing the shape and aggregate state<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>class_D is refering to some standard<br><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">cheers,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Martin<br></div></div>